When I was reading about constructivism I started thinking about standardized testing. I have a very difficult time being tested on standard things a student my age should know. I prefer testing the student to see what they are capable of learning. The reason why I agree with constructivism learning is because it is based on the students. The students take part, rather than acting as just lab rats. I feel this process allows the teacher to learn more about his/her students and also allows the teacher to reach the level needed for each student. After reading the articles listed on our ED 205 website, I don’t understand why every teacher wouldn’t choose this route.